We hold our own site to the standard we sell.
We audit other businesses for accessibility risk — it would be a bad look if our own site didn't meet a real standard. Here's what that actually means, and what to do if something's still wrong.
What we hold ourselves to
Real scans, not guesses
Every accessibility finding — ours or a client's — comes from an actual axe-core scan, not a visual once-over.
Keyboard navigable
Every interactive element on this site — links, buttons, the contact form — works without a mouse.
Readable contrast
Text and interactive elements are checked against real contrast ratios, not just what looks fine on one screen.
What our own last scan found
Claiming to run real scans is easy, so here is ours. On 12 September 2026, every page on this site was run through axe-core in a real browser, against WCAG 2.1 level A and AA, in both light and dark mode — 15 pages, 30 page-and-theme combinations.
It found two things, and both are fixed. Muted body text in light mode sat at a contrast ratio of 4.16 against some backgrounds, under the 4.5 that AA requires for normal text, so that colour was darkened until it cleared on every surface we use. And the fade-in that runs as you scroll ignored the operating system's reduce-motion setting, so it now stops animating for anyone who has asked for less movement.
The current result is zero violations across all 30 combinations. That is a real number from a real tool, not a badge we awarded ourselves, and we will update it here when it changes.
Found a real issue on this site?
Tell us directly and we'll fix it — no ticket system, no runaround. This isn't a legal disclaimer page; it's an open invitation to actually flag what's broken.
Prefer email? Write to rushil@ruvisibility.com.